Home Poal14

5 Shocking New Twists In The Enfield Poltergeist Case: Hoax Or Haunting? (2025 Update)

• minute read
Contents

The Enfield Poltergeist case, a haunting saga from 1977 that terrified a family in a North London council house, continues to be one of the most debated paranormal events in history. Despite decades of scrutiny, the core question remains unanswered: was 284 Green Street home to a genuine supernatural entity, or was it an elaborate childhood hoax? As of December 24, 2025, the case is experiencing a continuous re-evaluation, fueled by recent documentaries, podcasts, and crucial new statements from key figures that challenge the long-held "debunked" narrative.

The story, which inspired the film *The Conjuring 2*, involves flying furniture, cold spots, disembodied voices, and the alleged levitation of 11-year-old Janet Hodgson. This article dives into the latest twists and entities that keep this chilling chapter of British paranormal lore alive and deeply controversial.

Key Figures and Entity Biographies (The Enfield Case)

The Enfield Poltergeist case, which took place in Brimsdown, Enfield, London, between 1977 and 1979, involved several primary individuals and two main investigating bodies. The events centered on the Hodgson family.

  • Peggy Hodgson (Mother): A single mother of four who lived at 284 Green Street. She was the first to report the disturbances, which included furniture sliding and unexplained knocking sounds. She maintained her belief in the supernatural nature of the events until her death.
  • Janet Hodgson (Daughter): Aged 11 at the time, she was the primary focus of the alleged poltergeist activity. She was reportedly thrown from her bed, spoke in a gruff, elderly male voice (identified as "Bill"), and was the subject of the famous "levitation" photograph. She later admitted to faking some events but insisted the majority were real.
  • Margaret Hodgson (Daughter): Aged 13, she was Janet's older sister and the second child involved in the phenomena.
  • John and Billy Hodgson (Sons): The younger brothers who also lived in the house during the disturbances.
  • Maurice Grosse (Investigator): A member of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) who dedicated years to the case. He was a staunch believer in the haunting and gathered much of the audio and photographic evidence. He died in 2006.
  • Guy Playfair (Investigator): Also an SPR member and author of *This House Is Haunted: The True Story of the Enfield Poltergeist*. He spent a significant amount of time at the house and supported Grosse's conclusions about the genuineness of the phenomena. He died in 2018.
  • Bill (The Entity): The alleged poltergeist entity, whose deep, gruff voice was recorded coming from Janet's throat. He claimed to be the spirit of a man who had died in the house, named Bill Wilkins, who had gone blind and died in a chair downstairs.

The Latest Debate: New Statements and The Hoax Re-Evaluation

In the past few years, the Enfield Poltergeist case has seen a resurgence in media, primarily driven by critical re-examinations and new, detailed statements from people involved. This continuous stream of analysis prevents the case from becoming settled history, keeping the "hoax vs. haunting" debate very much alive.

1. The Photographer's Denial: A Major Twist on the 'Levitation' Photo

One of the most iconic pieces of evidence is the photo taken by Graham Morris, a photographer for the *Daily Mirror*, showing Janet Hodgson seemingly levitating or flying across her bedroom. For years, sceptics cited Morris's alleged off-the-record comment that "she just jumped" as proof of a hoax.

However, recent reports and discussions, including those circulating in 2024, indicate that Morris has publicly denied ever making this comment. Morris has consistently insisted that he did not see Janet jump and that the event unfolded too quickly to be a staged action. This denial is a significant twist, as it removes one of the most frequently cited pieces of "debunking" evidence used by sceptics, forcing a re-evaluation of the photo's authenticity and the overall evidence.

2. The Ongoing Sceptical Re-Examination (The 'Teenage Hormones' Theory)

Despite the photographer's denial, the scientific and sceptical community, including prominent figures like Professor Chris French, continues to firmly believe the case was a hoax perpetrated by the Hodgson sisters. Their arguments are often framed around the concept of "teenage girl hormones" and the psychological aspects of the events.

Sceptics point out that the phenomena—such as the moving furniture—often occurred when the investigators were absent or when the lighting was poor, suggesting a deliberate manipulation of the environment. Furthermore, Janet Hodgson herself admitted to faking some of the events, such as bending spoons, stating that they "wanted to see if Mr. Grosse and Mr. Playfair would catch them". For sceptics, this admission taints all the evidence and is the ultimate proof that the entire haunting was a product of mischief and attention-seeking behavior.

3. The Unexplained Audio Evidence and the 'Bill Wilkins' Voice

The most compelling piece of evidence for the haunting theory remains the audio recordings of the deep, raspy voice of "Bill Wilkins." This voice, which claimed to be a former resident who died in the house, seemed to emanate from Janet's throat, but with a quality that many investigators found impossible for a young girl to produce naturally. Maurice Grosse and Guy Playfair captured hours of this chilling voice on tape.

While sceptics argue that the voice was simply Janet altering her vocal cords, the sheer consistency, depth, and the fact that a ventriloquist was unable to replicate the effect have kept this element of the case firmly in the "unexplained" category. The story's topical authority is constantly reinforced by revisiting these original recordings, which are still circulated in paranormal media today.

4. The Modern Impact: 'The Conjuring 2' and New Documentaries

The 2016 film *The Conjuring 2* (starring Ed and Lorraine Warren, who briefly visited the house) brought the Enfield Poltergeist case back into the global spotlight, introducing it to a new generation. This cinematic depiction, which heavily favored the "haunting" narrative, prompted a new wave of investigative documentaries and deep-dive podcasts in the years that followed.

This modern media attention has led to a crucial shift: the focus is now less on the original events and more on the *legacy* of the events. New interviews with surviving family members and investigators (like the photographer Graham Morris) are continuously sought, providing fresh perspectives and challenging the decades-old consensus, ensuring the case remains a current event in the paranormal discussion.

5. The Final Word: Peggy Hodgson Never Changed Her Story

A final, powerful entity in the case is the unwavering testimony of the mother, Peggy Hodgson. While her daughter Janet later admitted to faking some small parts of the activity, Peggy Hodgson, who was a single mother thrust into a media circus, never changed her core position that the house was genuinely haunted.

Her consistent account, corroborated by independent witnesses like the police officer who saw a chair move, serves as a powerful counterpoint to the hoax theories. For believers, the idea that a mother would subject her family to years of intense media scrutiny and public ridicule for an elaborate, long-running lie is less plausible than the idea of a genuine paranormal disturbance. The conflict between a daughter's partial admission and a mother's lifelong testimony is the engine that keeps the Enfield Poltergeist case—the original "enfield case london"—a source of endless fascination and debate.

5 Shocking New Twists in The Enfield Poltergeist Case: Hoax or Haunting? (2025 Update)
enfield case london
enfield case london

Detail Author:

  • Name : Hilda Johnson
  • Username : qosinski
  • Email : jwuckert@gmail.com
  • Birthdate : 1999-03-24
  • Address : 35469 Hamill Lodge East Darwin, DE 24304
  • Phone : +1-949-890-1792
  • Company : Mante PLC
  • Job : Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operator
  • Bio : Aut et eius sit est. Totam qui quam cupiditate. Optio minima natus numquam ex repellendus sit maxime omnis. Quasi provident ad et eum quia animi sed. Quia aut impedit dolore suscipit.

Socials

twitter:

  • url : https://twitter.com/aylin.christiansen
  • username : aylin.christiansen
  • bio : Sunt qui dicta eveniet vero temporibus. Vel et laborum voluptas neque. Qui architecto hic tempore. Ad odit fugiat eum quaerat.
  • followers : 4016
  • following : 237

tiktok:

linkedin:

Random Posts